In any post on this site — you should consider the person does two things ,besides the obvious of misspelling words or blatantly using the wrong word on purpose , first the writing style is androgynous — meaning you can plug in any person in the role of seducer or seduced as primary players and you get a different story; second the stories look like streams of consciousness . This is to say the authors are trying to hide the identity of who they , so they can fabricate several different story lines. Everything they do is to hide the profile of being between the ages of 20 – 29 male. If you have many of these stories on your computer you can do string searches by entering key words or small phrases and you can see that this search can indicate that the authorship might be the same person. Another way of looking at this is the seducer is pretending to be the seduced in the storyline. This is so they can say the person is revealing more than expected and asking the question did you like what you saw? They borrow text from other stories because of the shock value. Nothing in any of these writings can make you a better lover just a better loser. As a comparison to not being a better lover in the movie Private Lessons which is approaching its 30 year mark you do not see the character morph when the role of Ms Phipps becomes the role of sherman. Meaning Miss Phipps tells Philly she will introduce him to a girl more appropriate to his age. You do not see this introduction but you see Sherman introduction to Nicole Mallow. This fallacy explains the first scene in the movie and the last scene of the movie which are out of order to give the viewer that the seduced can become the seducer
1473 Views |
1
Anonymous
Processing your request, Please wait....
